IMECH-IR  > 流固耦合系统力学重点实验室
Theoretical Comparison of Test Performance of Different Pulse Decay Methods for Unconventional Cores
Han GF(韩国锋)1; Liu XL2; Huang J2
通讯作者Liu, Xiaoli(xiaoli.liu@tsinghua.edu.cn)
发表期刊ENERGIES
2020-09-01
卷号13期号:17页码:21
摘要Various pulse decay methods are proposed to test tight cores. These methods can be divided into three types. This study compares the performance of these methods to test the permeability of unconventional cores in terms of homogeneous cores, dual-medium cores, and gas adsorption, including the pressure equilibrium time, possible errors caused by conventional analysis methods, and reflections on the characteristics of dual-media. Studies shows that the two test methods with an antisymmetric relationship in the boundary conditions have basically identical test performance. When testing homogeneous cores, regardless of whether the gas is adsorptive or not, the pressure equilibrium time of the first type of method is approximately half of that of the second type of method. The dual-medium parameters seriously affect the pressure equilibrium time of different methods, which may cause the difference of order of magnitude. For homogeneous cores, the permeability errors of the first and second types of methods caused by porosity errors are similar and larger than that of the third type of method. For dual media, the fracture permeability obtained by the third type of method using the conventional analysis method may differ from the actual value by tens of times. No method can significantly eliminate the sorption effect. When the core is a dual-medium, only the pressure curves of the upstream positive-pulse method, downstream negative-pulse method and one-chamber method can reflect the characteristics of dual media. The pressure derivative of the one-chamber method cannot reflect the characteristics of dual media at the early time. The pressure derivative of the second type and the upstream positive-pulse downstream negative-pulse method can reflect the complete characteristics of dual media, but their pressure derivative of the constant-slope segment is small, and the interporosity flow parameter may not be identified.
关键词pulse decay method gas adsorption dual media unconventional core
DOI10.3390/en13174557
收录类别SCI ; EI
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000571134500001
关键词[WOS]MULTISCALE GAS-TRANSPORT ; DUAL-CONTINUUM MEDIUM ; PERMEABILITY ; SHALES ; ROCKS ; FLOW
WOS研究方向Energy & Fuels
WOS类目Energy & Fuels
资助项目National Natural Science Foundation of China[11602276] ; National Key R&D Program of China[2018YFC1504801] ; National Key R&D Program of China[2018YFC1504902]
项目资助者National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Key R&D Program of China
论文分区Q3
力学所作者排名1
RpAuthorLiu, Xiaoli
引用统计
被引频次:6[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://dspace.imech.ac.cn/handle/311007/85301
专题流固耦合系统力学重点实验室
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China;
2.Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Han GF,Liu XL,Huang J. Theoretical Comparison of Test Performance of Different Pulse Decay Methods for Unconventional Cores[J]. ENERGIES,2020,13,17,:21.
APA 韩国锋,Liu XL,&Huang J.(2020).Theoretical Comparison of Test Performance of Different Pulse Decay Methods for Unconventional Cores.ENERGIES,13(17),21.
MLA 韩国锋,et al."Theoretical Comparison of Test Performance of Different Pulse Decay Methods for Unconventional Cores".ENERGIES 13.17(2020):21.
条目包含的文件 下载所有文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Jp2020328.pdf(7608KB)期刊论文出版稿开放获取CC BY-NC-SA浏览 下载
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
Lanfanshu学术
Lanfanshu学术中相似的文章
[韩国锋]的文章
[Liu XL]的文章
[Huang J]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[韩国锋]的文章
[Liu XL]的文章
[Huang J]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[韩国锋]的文章
[Liu XL]的文章
[Huang J]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Jp2020328.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。