Theoretical Comparison of Test Performance of Different Pulse Decay Methods for Unconventional Cores | |
Han GF(韩国锋)1; Liu XL2; Huang J2 | |
通讯作者 | Liu, Xiaoli(xiaoli.liu@tsinghua.edu.cn) |
发表期刊 | ENERGIES |
2020-09-01 | |
卷号 | 13期号:17页码:21 |
摘要 | Various pulse decay methods are proposed to test tight cores. These methods can be divided into three types. This study compares the performance of these methods to test the permeability of unconventional cores in terms of homogeneous cores, dual-medium cores, and gas adsorption, including the pressure equilibrium time, possible errors caused by conventional analysis methods, and reflections on the characteristics of dual-media. Studies shows that the two test methods with an antisymmetric relationship in the boundary conditions have basically identical test performance. When testing homogeneous cores, regardless of whether the gas is adsorptive or not, the pressure equilibrium time of the first type of method is approximately half of that of the second type of method. The dual-medium parameters seriously affect the pressure equilibrium time of different methods, which may cause the difference of order of magnitude. For homogeneous cores, the permeability errors of the first and second types of methods caused by porosity errors are similar and larger than that of the third type of method. For dual media, the fracture permeability obtained by the third type of method using the conventional analysis method may differ from the actual value by tens of times. No method can significantly eliminate the sorption effect. When the core is a dual-medium, only the pressure curves of the upstream positive-pulse method, downstream negative-pulse method and one-chamber method can reflect the characteristics of dual media. The pressure derivative of the one-chamber method cannot reflect the characteristics of dual media at the early time. The pressure derivative of the second type and the upstream positive-pulse downstream negative-pulse method can reflect the complete characteristics of dual media, but their pressure derivative of the constant-slope segment is small, and the interporosity flow parameter may not be identified. |
关键词 | pulse decay method gas adsorption dual media unconventional core |
DOI | 10.3390/en13174557 |
收录类别 | SCI ; EI |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000571134500001 |
关键词[WOS] | MULTISCALE GAS-TRANSPORT ; DUAL-CONTINUUM MEDIUM ; PERMEABILITY ; SHALES ; ROCKS ; FLOW |
WOS研究方向 | Energy & Fuels |
WOS类目 | Energy & Fuels |
资助项目 | National Natural Science Foundation of China[11602276] ; National Key R&D Program of China[2018YFC1504801] ; National Key R&D Program of China[2018YFC1504902] |
项目资助者 | National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Key R&D Program of China |
论文分区 | Q3 |
力学所作者排名 | 1 |
RpAuthor | Liu, Xiaoli |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://dspace.imech.ac.cn/handle/311007/85301 |
专题 | 流固耦合系统力学重点实验室 |
作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China; 2.Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Han GF,Liu XL,Huang J. Theoretical Comparison of Test Performance of Different Pulse Decay Methods for Unconventional Cores[J]. ENERGIES,2020,13,17,:21. |
APA | 韩国锋,Liu XL,&Huang J.(2020).Theoretical Comparison of Test Performance of Different Pulse Decay Methods for Unconventional Cores.ENERGIES,13(17),21. |
MLA | 韩国锋,et al."Theoretical Comparison of Test Performance of Different Pulse Decay Methods for Unconventional Cores".ENERGIES 13.17(2020):21. |
条目包含的文件 | 下载所有文件 | |||||
文件名称/大小 | 文献类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
Jp2020328.pdf(7608KB) | 期刊论文 | 出版稿 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 下载 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
Lanfanshu学术 |
Lanfanshu学术中相似的文章 |
[韩国锋]的文章 |
[Liu XL]的文章 |
[Huang J]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[韩国锋]的文章 |
[Liu XL]的文章 |
[Huang J]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[韩国锋]的文章 |
[Liu XL]的文章 |
[Huang J]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论